InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tpizzazz24

05/29/14 5:02 PM

#70433 RE: Spinmckin #70432

Hello there and thanks for your informative postings. I was under the assumption that Punget would supply SuzyQ brand and we would profit through Punget as formentioned by your post..I thought this being they are two seperate businesses..what would the point of owning a chain of NPO'S? But if they could buy their product from Puget then they could supply their patients..it is confusing..I am just looking forward to the Tier1 license..baby steps..peace
icon url

Stock Steward

05/29/14 8:31 PM

#70442 RE: Spinmckin #70432

I was under the impression from the latest filing that PMCM did not want to go into the recreational market but specifically wanted to remain in the medical cannabis market?

Why do you think they will now be involved in the recreational Washington market? I would be delighted if that was the case, but the fact that the filing specifically made it clear PMCM would just be medical for the time being has me thinking otherwise.

icon url

DrSteven

05/30/14 12:35 PM

#70472 RE: Spinmckin #70432

Excellent post and explanation! Puget power=$$$$$$$
icon url

hg42

05/30/14 4:17 PM

#70487 RE: Spinmckin #70432

Spinmckin explains it properly, well done

I will add this seems to be the trend other states - also keep in mind that PMCM is hedging their foray into the market with the Canadian supply side