InvestorsHub Logo

Crow3

05/27/14 10:33 PM

#42700 RE: Crow3 #42699

IRONICALLY, the three plaintiffs re the class action were big supporters of MP at the time, except MILLIE, who as a Lawyer SHOULD have seen what was coming down, but really did not have much of a clue. All he knew was that he wanted his dang shares back, stolen by the LOCH BOYOS.

MILLIE was a fence straddler, not sure whether he was being given the Idiot treatment or not. Ran hot and cold re CDEX.

He should have stuck with real estate closings.

pennstreet

05/28/14 11:17 AM

#42707 RE: Crow3 #42699

Crow3--

Definition of DEMURRER--

a response in a court proceeding in which the defendant does not dispute the truth of the allegation but claims it is not sufficient grounds to justify legal action .

Once again, one has twisted the facts as to what the real history knows. One for all and all for one needed to be filed so that ALL had the chance to gain what was allowed by the court as acceptable.

Read this part again:

"""the defendant does not dispute the truth of the allegation """