InvestorsHub Logo

integral

05/16/14 4:07 PM

#67573 RE: janice shell #67570

Do you think when they purchased the shell in early of 2009, they took into account all the phases of the history of the company's dormant status and the 2008 rule changes that went into effect only a few months earlier?

I doubt they delved to deeply into SEC rule changes, and now QASP is sitting on a crap load of unregistered securities since Sept. of 2008.

I cannot imagine there is anyone over there at QASP that has any legal experience now, nor were paying attention to rule changes then.

LeGoose

05/16/14 11:58 PM

#67599 RE: janice shell #67570

Agreed. The collateral damage (investor losses) is already done.