InvestorsHub Logo

bar1080

05/10/14 11:16 PM

#2129 RE: here4beer #2128

BRZV's 10-K mentions "Risk" 23 times. I'm guessing that increasing that to 24 times wouldn't have saved him.

Note too the 10-K: "An investment in our Company involves a substantial risk of loss.

This is an oil company that couldn't even make it as a Chinese restaurant.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1337182/000137216714000039/breezer10ksept302013.htm

bar1080

05/10/14 11:24 PM

#2130 RE: here4beer #2128

In pennyland filings, WARNINGS are often the only accurate thing. He's just pizzed that he couldn't unload BRZV on some old lady before the music stopped.

--
How many times has he seen this sort of warning and ignored it?

"The company's financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Since inception, the Company has accumulated losses aggregating to $265,361 and has insufficient working capital to meet operating needs for the next twelve months as of September 30, 2013, all of which raise substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

What the hell do you expect the Federal government to do to save you from yourself?

bar1080

05/10/14 11:44 PM

#2132 RE: here4beer #2128

"Mr. Tang Xu was appointed...the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary"

Why don't disgruntled shareholders contact and perhaps even file suit against him... probably somewhere 8,000 miles away. Good luck with that LOLOLOL!

Again... How many red flags can one stock have?