comparable" is subjective and "ascertain(ing) *veracity*" can be interpreted several ways...
... again, the challenge will be easier (actually do-able) once you define what it is that you are wanting to compare (be "on par") and what you mean by ascertaining veracity.
For example: Item #3 is rather simplistic and straight forward; the SEC stated: "Please tell us where you have filed your amended certificate of incorporation to change your name from 310 Holdings, Inc. to JBI, Inc., and when this change occurred."
So to be clear, are you asking if any other company was ever asked by an SEC review process where they filed an amendment to corporate documents? I wouldn't think so; rather, I think we can cross this one off the list as we should be able to agree that would be silly-- of course they ask those types of questions to lots-- if not most -- companies.
But for... perhaps there is a veracity angle ... as in perhaps the SEC already knew where the files were and when they filed them, but were just being dishonest with JBI (posing "stump the dummy" questions)...
... whatever the case is, you need to be more clear in your definitions/condition set so that the "challenge" is even attempt-able.
There are only 33 points-- shouldn't be too hard to qualify each one (actually only 32 left if we agree on #3).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
