InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: jimmenknee post# 267875

Thursday, 05/08/2014 1:30:10 PM

Thursday, May 08, 2014 1:30:10 PM

Post# of 312015
ticker with link re: sec's upload specific to correspondence to X OTC company

edit >> on par = comparable
as in each respective reader of this venue
can read and ascertain *veracity* of what dolts' >> er >> *authored*
re: comparable aka on par >> correspondence



on par with their (dolts') correspondence to JBI on 9.28.10 which as i've noted
wasn't made public till almost one year later (Aug 2011)

back story reminder >> it's my contention that the PROs' cycle of $
was impacted across a few levels in early 2010 (orchestrated run up
in DEC 2009 needed to be followed with an equally significant
orchestrated take down of *legit* <not reset shares>)

hence undertaking re: first authored hit piece and importation of CSTI
to aid and abet naughty NITE (July 2010)

when that failed to shake out JBII shares (even tho' PPS was significantly reduced)

dolts enter the picture (9.28.10) at the behest of >>

btw this is why i originally advocated for a trial (even tho' common sense
recognized costs prohibitive at that/this stage of JBI's development)
because discovery would have revealed CONnections in play
re: OTC *cycle*

as i've also noted numerous times >> had a mere 20 minutes of DD been undertaken
re: certs held and by whom re: JBII in May 2010 >> odds are
the *orchestrated pps take down* would have been handled differently

and yep that is my *opinion* based on 4 years of documentation re: JBII *trades*

4kids
all jmo





10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --