InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jmspaesq

05/17/03 7:10 PM

#26321 RE: blueskywaves #26311

BSW: Absolutely On the Mark AGAIN!

Yes there is no way that IDCC can possibly be what it needs to be unless it remains competitive for the top tier of talent, the creme de la creme.

And if those people aren't compensated, they'll go elsewhere.

How does the David IDCC compete with the Goliaths of this industry unless it recruits and retains top talent?

And if we don't, then we'll be all about the past, and we will forefeit our futures. Investing is about the future, not the past.

I don't understand the attitude where we begrudge a portion of future growth to those we are depending upon to produce it. It is almost like we expect wage slaves to be creative productive happy people who will feel a part of the enterprise.

IMHO if top talent chooses us over others and stays with us, that is a great vote of confidence. When they accept our options as compensation and incentive, they are saying that they think those options will be worth something.

Rather than begrudging the idea that employees could be millionaires (or billionaires??? LOL) I would applaud it--because if the number of options granted makes them that rich then each and everyone of us will do pretty darn well too! At least according to the math I did it will. I don't know what mickey's alternative math universe math might tell but my math says we'll end up doing pretty well indeed.
icon url

firerocket77

05/17/03 7:38 PM

#26325 RE: blueskywaves #26311

We need to focus our advocacy on getting the rules changed IMO, not on creating trouble for one of our personal investments.

....especially not one that has outperformed 99% of the total stock market for the last 2 years due to genuine improvements in its fundamentals. LOL.



Yes...how right you are....two wrongs make a right!
Since there are others that are robbing their shareholders why can't IDCC? LOL


BTW...do you get straight time for Saturdays or are you paid per post? LOL