Certainly I agree they would be wanting to reach an amicable resolution (heck, they better be, considering IP is at stake!), I have NEVER said otherwise, so please stop trying to make out I am. All I am trying to respond to is those who are trying to claim there was no default in the first place, which is CLEARLY fallacy. That is it, period.
This is my last post for the day. I urge you all to do your dd - you are not doing yourself any favors denying the fact that ACTC defaulted. As long as some keep responding (without any proof whatsoever) that ACTC didn't default, I will continue to respond (with proof) that they did.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
