NO, it's DUTV's job a this point to provide evidence that their financials are based on factual revenues.
I can't understand how DUTV continues to get off so easily although they have produced not one partner (besides the elusive TORQ) nor peice of tangible evidence that they are carrying out their stated business plan successfully.
I'd think that every shareholder here who can't produce solid evidence of DUTV's claims should be demanding that Garry produce at this point.
To file a revenue does not tell or show they have the technology.If they have the tech they would have got the patent long time a go, no patent no product.