InvestorsHub Logo

Xander3

04/23/14 7:09 AM

#70429 RE: Greedy G #70414

What rationale are you using to think that someone might have to sell for a lose at some point in their trading career? ECDC is moving between 1's and 2's now; whereas, last month it was moving between 1's and 3's.

If people bought into ECDC in the 3's and wanted out now before it drops further, they would have to sell in the 2's. That's called a loss. They didn't buy with the intent of selling at a loss it is just the way it happened. Failure to understand such a simple concept as this is just ridiculous, as is, the condescending attitude used in a question that most non-traders could answer.

Consider yourself enlightened.

chicagodog

04/23/14 7:15 AM

#70431 RE: Greedy G #70414

people who bought into the hype and wised up, and got out while they still had a chance. Of course, following your logic, no one has ever taken a loss in the market, as there is no rationale.


Who buys 60M just to sell at a loss? What's the rationale? Pls enlighten the board.

flaflyersfan

04/23/14 8:05 AM

#70436 RE: Greedy G #70414

Greedy G, parties receiving ECDC stock at .00005 and less are not selling for a loss at .0002 or even .0001. EOM