InvestorsHub Logo

goodolboy

04/19/14 11:05 PM

#341635 RE: janice shell #341634

I'm not sure that's a legally acceptable quantification of shares dumped illegally into the market, but it certainly gets the point across! LOL!

Diamondsrus

04/21/14 1:19 AM

#341641 RE: janice shell #341634

So in other words his offense was to sell shares to a bunch of people that were clamoring to buy them? There is a saying on wall street: when the ducks are quacking, feed them. All Urbie and John did was sell shares to Xers who wanted desperately to buy them. The shares were validly issued. The buyers got exactly what they paid for in an arms length transaction.