Replies to post #25596 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[blueskywaves]

Why don't you let him answer for himself? LOL. He's perfectly ccapable of throwing up numbers to cover his losses just like a ssquid uses ink to cover its tracks.

The last time I took apart his premise and the arguments that flowed from that premise, he didn't even bother to respond because he couldn't.

Here, for example, I exposed his total lack of understanding of the IPR business. This is probably too subtle for you but I was showing everybody how his poor understanding of an emerging IPR industry explains his poor grasp of the risks and rewards of business plans and career choices. Note his statement:

If you could come up with about 10 or so small-cap IPR technology companies with similar revenues to IDCC, like Rambus and ARMHY, then I would give much more credence to your study and conclusions.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=990140

That's classic inside the box thinking.

Here again I took apart his basis for comparing executive compensation packages. He insisted on using 17 small-cap technology companies, none of whom were directly in the licensing business like QCOM, ARMHY and RMBS. He couldn't even bring himself to add those licensing companies to the basket of stocks that he was using as the basis for his claims about executive compensation!!! Again, no response

An individual owner did a study of 17 small-cap technology companies. His findings were that IDCC’s salary and bonuses were significantly more than the other companies, even though these comparable market-cap company’s average revenues were twice that of IDCC.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=990971

And of course, I also demonstrated that he was just as wrong about the accounting treatment of restricted stock as he was about the negative effect of insider selling on the stock.

There's a lot more, but I'm not that interested in dwelling in the past. I'm more interesting in applying the acid test to his true agenda in the light of today's press release, which by the way, is notable for its dishonest use of an unscientific online poll to support unregurgitated arguments about dilution already discredited on this board.

Notice the pattern? LOL.

[arthritis65]

plumear,,,could you be part of the great 12 posters that are together and you are taking up for ronnie way to hard...put your name in the hat when we find out who did what...seems none of the 12 have the guts to fess up...what a spineless bunch we have...first conversation with a fed of any of them ..they will puke out what has taken place...