When RMBS asked for an extension to respond to the RICO case filed in VA by MU (Rambus, I think wanted 30 days but MU would only agree to less - 14?), had RMBS already revealed that they were filing a motion to enjoin MU from continuing in VA?
re: This matter may be expedited because of "rocket docket" dates
Hey Pruf,
According to this docket entry posted by Docrew yesterday, Rambus's reply to Micron's complaint is due March 14.
==========================
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:06-cv-00132-REP
03/06/2006 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc.. Rambus, Inc. served on 2/22/2006, answer due 3/14/2006. (jtho, ) (Entered: 03/06/2006)
But this appears to be in conflict with Ms. Graham's letter to Judge Jordan dated March 3:
==========================
By filing its duplicative action in the Virginia “rocket docket,” Micron plainly intends to take advantage of the accelerated procedures in that court, which will mean that Rambus will be simultaneously involved in pretrial and discovery matters for the very same issues in two different federal courts; and two courts simultaneously will be considering the same issues relating to discovery and the merits of the dispute. Rambus’s response to the complaint in the Virginia Action is due on March 28,
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
