InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HALF FULL GLASS

03/05/06 10:26 AM

#2388 RE: bocxman #2387

Well Bocxman I have been saying for a long time that this stock should be trading at $100 per share. If you could summarize your last post into a few words it would probably explain why the stock is under $1.00.

This is directly off of Abbotts web page...I don't think they want it for just a small niche !!

Because many cancer deaths may be prevented with early screening and treatment, it's important to develop new cancer tests that could more effectively target a specific type of cancer. Preliminary studies indicate that RECAF may provide good clinical sensitivity and specificity as a tumor marker," said William Brown, Ph.D., vice president, Diagnostic Assays and Systems Development, Abbott. "Abbott's goal is to further develop this technology, incorporating it into future tests on our ARCHITECT ® system, for use in cancer diagnosis and monitoring."

Under terms of the agreement, Abbott obtains worldwide, semi-exclusive rights to commercialize products using BioCurex's RECAF technology. The agreement includes payment to BioCurex of up-front fees, product development milestones and royalties on any product sales. Other terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

http://abbottdiagnostics.com/About_Us/pressrelease.cfm?pr_id=60





icon url

longterm42

03/05/06 10:46 AM

#2389 RE: bocxman #2387

bocxman: i'm holding bocx as you and all the other longs on this board. you are rigth with your demand. i'm frustrated too. but wrigth or wrong, i think that MORO is not going to spend another nickel for trying to proof this technology to us. my believe is that he is very confident that this will all work very well and is leaving that totaly to come in form of confirmation from abbott. just my opinion
icon url

Kag

03/05/06 12:31 PM

#2391 RE: bocxman #2387

1. The future for testing human blood samples lies in automated, rapid test systems called "analyzers." Abbott has their Architect system and Bayer has their Centaur system. Other diagnostic testing companies have other versions. Any mass screening test must be incorporated into an automated system or it will never be successful.

2. The first milestone for the Abbott deal is Abbott's notification to Biocurex of Abbott's successful completion of its feasibility review. Since Abbott licensed the RECAF technology to implement blood tests into Abbott's Architect analyzer system, this first milestone is obviously based on a feasibility review for whether or not that is possible.

3. Everything is meaningless right now except for Abbott announcing that the RECAF technology can and will be incorporated into their Architect analyzer system. When that happens, BioCurex should have sufficient funds to get off the pink sheets, and Wall Street will begin to take notice of the little company called BioCurex.

4. There is no need for BioCurex to go to the unnecessary expense for further independent studies which say that the RECAF serum technology has some specific sensitivity. The only thing that counts right now is what Abbott says about the RECAF technology that they licensed. Abbott is going to either say that it is feasible for the RECAF serum technology to be incorporated into their Architect system or it isn't. If Abbott says "yes" the stock price will fly.

5. It has been almost a year since the Abbott deal was announced. If things were not going well the license would have likely already been returned. Dr. Moro is giving positive hints. Abbott's notification to BioCurex of Abbott's successful completion of its feasibility review requires a milestone payment to BioCurex. Not all of us agree on the amount of money that will be paid with the successful completion of that Milestone, but could be in the millions. Once Abbott makes that announcement and payment, progress should be rapid. Preparations for any necessary clinical trials will likely already have been made. Unlike drug trials, clinical trials of a non-invasive blood test can be done relatively quickly. Those trials and FDA approval could come within a year. A FDA priority review is also possible (since this is a highly sensitive early screening cancer detection test) and that could shorten the time.

6. Also, the time required for FDA approval is somewhat a moot point because Abbott will pay annual minimum royalties to BioCurex commencing with the year ending December 31, 2007 and continuing each subsequent calendar year. That will be a revenue stream for BioCurex. One of the most important Wall Street evaluation factors for a biotech is when will the biotech start making money. Dr. Moro was very smart to have royalty income begin by a certain date that is relatively near. There is no reason to be discouraged with this investment at this particular time. I realize that it is not easy, but be patient. kag
icon url

erthang

03/05/06 4:48 PM

#2397 RE: bocxman #2387

Bocxman - if you recall, Dr. Moro, or was it Dr. Whitenburg, said that they are going to focus their energy on working with the Pharmas that are interested in licensing the technology, proving to them that the technology works (via, blind tests)because it is they who will be lacing the company's pockets. He said that time, money and energy should be focused on that, rather than what you are talking about. He is right! Your point of view seems to come out of impatience, not practicality. Licensing deals should be the focus, and what you are talking about will follow in due time!!!