InvestorsHub Logo

Deano361

04/04/14 8:34 AM

#24271 RE: Gallant #24270

That's possible but odds are he's not judging by his record . I'm here either way to play my millions of shares out

Penemy

04/04/14 8:51 AM

#24272 RE: Gallant #24270

@gallant. The reverse split without a PR is definitely a big time shakedown, delivered by somebody 5 min after the paperwork hit the NEVADA SOS. IMO, Hes definitely buying back, but the rest is still a puzzle.

jn1520

04/04/14 9:19 AM

#24277 RE: Gallant #24270

Gallant - I am SO GLAD you brought this up. The accumulation has been off the charts, and I would not be surprised AT ALL if this R/S maneuver was a Smoke Screen....

norcalgold

04/04/14 9:52 AM

#24281 RE: Gallant #24270

If the R/S was dropped so FH could buy back shares, then why 1:6000? He could have set it up much better to represent a dilution scheme and get much more shares. That is not what is occurring here