InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1199
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: jtaylor post# 147184

Friday, 03/03/2006 2:04:31 PM

Friday, March 03, 2006 2:04:31 PM

Post# of 432962
jtaylor, Thank you for your response. If a patent is valid and being infringed, is it reasonable to assume that it is essential? If it is merely important and readily crcumvented, why is it being infringed? Should the inventor and investor be penalized because the infringer is lazy, unwilling to pay the additional costs to circumvent, or stupid?
I believe in patent validity. You use it you pay. One additional point: The passage of time may drastically alter the essential nature of a patent. Is a patent essential for yesterday's product still essential after the introduction of new technology?


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News