InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 13514
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/07/2012

Re: stratford1 post# 29795

Wednesday, 03/26/2014 12:23:18 PM

Wednesday, March 26, 2014 12:23:18 PM

Post# of 60123
...amy was politicized and dragged out the process........she also had a BLATANT COI, imo........

...amy would have been appealed EITHER WAY - even if we had WON.........but we also could have forced a send-back for a full trial, had we pursued the APPEAL.........and amy asked herself a question near the end of her ruling that asked whether the bank would have survived had the OTS given the bank and CRP more time to materialize.........."maybe," she stated to herself............appealable, BIGTIME.........

...and remember, amy rendered an APPEALABLE decision..............

...the reason for delays in a BK are purposeful...............the timing is controlled by the PETITIONER.......and the Claimant's beagles........and if the FDIC is involved........YEARS........


...only question: was/is there a STIPULATION................and if so........................how much for BACKDOOR no: 8.....??????........if larry was speaking to anyone, he would answer yes and probably mutter, "a couple of bucks each per share, but don't quote me on that".............................IF.........hello...............????.......who is larry, btw...........????????........



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.