Who gets $600K per cloud?
It sure isn't WDAS, just licensing fees that are claimed to be 10%, but the only "DD" here is provided by fluff PRs, what Fabio says and what the new found attention can blow it out of proportion to, like claiming $600K per cloud and 3% of the sale of electricity which goes to the power clouds "company" not WDAS.
Maybe financials will answer some of the unknowns if Fabio ever gets done updating the OTC 1 item at a time to report disclosures for WDAS because we all know there will never be any "confirmation" of how successful Wor(l)d is, financials won't be released as it's a private company with supposedly power clouds as a subsidiary supposedly receiving the $600K plus 3%.
Why create a licensing "company" for a public company?
Why not just roll in the power clouds "company" if truly looking out for the shareholders?
Oh that's right, power clouds would have to provide financials and a new "licensing company" wouldn't.
