InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[laranger]

I was wrong in saying Samsung's agreement is not the same as Nokia's, when it comes to named manufacturers:

"In 2002. . . .Samsung elected. . ..to have (its) royalty obligations. . . determined in accordance with the terms of the Nokia patent license agreement, including its MFL provision.

....in March 2003, ITC notified Samsung that such Samsung obligations had been defined by the relevant licensing terms of ITC’s license agreements with Ericsson (for infrastructure products) and Sony Ericsson (for terminal unit products) as a result of the MFL provision in the Nokia license agreement."

Scusa.