You all avoid the fact that the company could honour their proposed deal, not necessarily exactly as some are hoping, but still within the word and that could be positive for both 'investors' and company; for this would blow your one side of the fence theories - which, I acknowledge, could well be right, as well as wrong.
It just requires a bit of lateral thinking of which, it appears, some of you are not capable, or with which you experience difficulty. You therefore avoid it.
No, I do not believe this company, or any company is motivated by altruism. But sometimes sincerely acting in a way that has a
win/win flavour can eventually produce the right results with less hassle from repercussions.
