InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[F6]

EconEli -- You've been hurling personal insults at and attempting to bully anyone and everyone who has had the temerity not to immediately and completely agree with and unquestioningly submit to your all-knowing take on prop 2 practically since you started posting on the issue, as you have done here any number of times again -- for example: "What you have here are a lot of uneducated people who pretend to be open-minded but are not." and "No one intelligent enough to deserve a vote will vote against the truth, once they understand it." As for any who might say they are undecided, you dismiss them as probable liars -- "disingenuous" -- likely engaged in a conspiracy against your 'truth', and as for any who might disagree with you in any way, well, they "would rather be blind and happy than use their own eyes to see the world." (And all this as you claim that YOU are open-minded, LOL.)

And more -- in this completely OT post full of nothing but breathless self-congratulation and snide insults of others, you state that "it is the "faithful" here to[sic] like to use OT insults to start a flame-fest" -- oh, sweet irony . . . and if any dare respond in any way to your relentless attacks, well, it's just due to their own natural human faults, their own natural human weakness, their own natural human envy of your manifest perfection, as by definition it could not possibly be due to any fault, weakness or imperfection of your own: "Do some people here hate me for it? Sure. That's life. People hate success, unless it is their own. That is the way of humanity. What do I care?" What do you care, indeed -- talk about preferring to be 'blind and happy' . . . impressive, EconEli, very impressive. (And just who exactly woke up and made you God, anyway? Nobody I've met . . .)

Your personal attack on me in this post is completely unwarranted and (once again) way out of line. (Not that I need to justify my existence to you in any way, as I most certainly don't, but -- I have strongly and repeatedly criticized HC for his excessive grants to himself going back years into the past, and I voted against him and managed to persuade some others to vote against him the last time he was up for re-election to the BOD.)

Your claimed history re GSTRF is utterly irrelevant to the present debate re prop 2, and your implicit equation of IDCC with GSTRF (and thus of IDCC longs who might not agree with all you say -- whom you derisively refer to as the ""faithful"" -- with the GSTRF ""faithful"") is at once both laughable and highly offensive.

To cap it off, your wildly untrue assertion that "the only people here able to offer a debate at [my] level are all already in support of my position on this subject" confirms beyond any possible remaining doubt or argument your preposterously arrogant conceit.

(By the way, just in case you haven't noticed -- you have a HUGE problem distinguishing your own opinion from fact; just because you think a thing does not make it a fact.) (For reference, THAT is a fact.)