InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 92
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/03/2014

Re: None

Friday, 03/07/2014 5:15:32 PM

Friday, March 07, 2014 5:15:32 PM

Post# of 701396
Much like how others have interpreted the PR - I read is it being as positive as can be, without actually stating a halt for efficacy.

- They were compelled by shareholders to ask the DMC for an update.

- The DMC hadn't completed their review of the data, but were happy to recommend a continue with the data at hand. i.e They are satisfied that there is no safety or futility risk (otherwise they would not have given the decision to continue).

- If there wasn't the possibility of an early halt for efficacy they would have simply said it was a continue (and nothing else, like the vast majority interim 'continue' decisions)

- The extra color added with their statement: "The DSMB's review of the efficacy data is still pending." was put in for a reason.
That reason, I believe, was to infer that efficacy data is encouraging enough to warrant further deliberation.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News