NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[Doktornolittle]

Why Not Just Call it a Continue?

Because apparently it is not just a continue! A lot of people asked that question in their posts today, and I don't understand why.

They could have said... "It's not a halt for safety or futility". That might have been more clear, but but then they would have been talking in negatives.

The other thing being said is that there is still the possibility of a halt for futility. Apparently some people believe this because efficacy has not been fully evaluated.

If that is the case, then NW's PR is misleading. So, I believe that is not the case.

However, having worked through this a couple of times now, I do see the frustration with the wording. I am back peddling a little bit. I hope that wording was necessary. If there is a chance of a halt for positive efficacy, then how could they call it a continue at this point. Maybe just no good way to say it. But... I do see the reason for frustration. And if there is still a possibility of halt for positive efficacy, then is there still a chance of halt for futility? I read it as no, but... I see the frustration.