InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 1234
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2010

Re: Moose_Bite post# 5484

Friday, 03/07/2014 2:08:48 PM

Friday, March 07, 2014 2:08:48 PM

Post# of 700172
Thank you that's all I needed to know! Someone else wrote on Yahoo I like the post it here that doesn't make sense..... egkainia • 3 hours ago Flag
12users liked this postsusers disliked this posts0Reply
Read between the lines.
What a Greek gift non investors got today... Listen, in a trial of this size and orientation, to say the trial should not be haulted for safety, and that they are still working out the details as to whether or not it should be haulted for efficacy, is the SAME THING as saying there is compelling data to suggest a hault for efficacy should take place. Of course, they can't say that in a PR, but they DID WITHOUT SAYING IT. Again, recall IMUC, in a very similar trial recently. Their data was not compelling, but safe. They got a quick "continue" turn around. Their treatment has subsequently been analyzed in comparison to DCVax L and found much inferior (overly selective). There is only one reason this is taking this long: they are working arduously to determine whether or not the data, which is COMPELLING, is also in the best interest of the company and the patients to call an early hault at this time. In order to determine this, they can leave no stone unturned. Everything has to be reviewed, rereviewed, confirmed, re confirmed, etc. Their finger is on the trigger, and it's the one that if pulled, sends the pps many multiples higher. Less
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News