InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 5531
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/31/2000

Re: therooster post# 12613

Thursday, 02/23/2006 11:29:14 AM

Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:29:14 AM

Post# of 23712
Gloom indeed. There are generally two sides to each and every issue. Had that lesson been learned earlier in the life of this company, there would be nowhere near the number of people on the short end of the stick as there are (including you, Rooster). It's not unlike having cancer and going to enough doctors that, sooner-or-later, you'll have one of them tell you what you want to hear. That just might be exactly what you want to hear, but it could kill you. Likewise BeeJay's explanation of what appears to be some very shady goings-on. Sounds non-benign, but certainly shouldn't be taken necessarily at face value. It boils down to our being financed by loan sharks based in the Caymans who apparently want millions of shares available for sale "just in case". If you care to be heartened by that, Rooster, be my guest.

Personally, I see very little associated with that filing that floated my boat. Granted, there were "updates" on the demo plates (thank you, dfh). And March was projected as the time period that one party would be back to us with results of their testing. Seems to me I asked that exact question during the CC and was stonewalled.

"Vigilance" should be the new Word for the Day.