InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 135
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/03/2003

Re: witchhollow post# 23442

Wednesday, 05/07/2003 1:37:08 PM

Wednesday, May 07, 2003 1:37:08 PM

Post# of 433036
Ken, try to stay focussed here.

You are bouncing all over the wall with your reply. Let's talk about IDCC for now OK?

Are shorts sitting on a "powder keg" here? Sure, no argument from me.

Is the float in IDCC too small for some of the bigger buyers? Maybe, so no argument from me.

Does any of that mean that the way the issue should be handled is for IDCC managers to give themselves 15-20 million shares worth of IDCC options? Not in this universe. Not that I can do anything about most of it -- but I can at least continue to point out that IDCC does not need a blank check to write themselves another 5 million shares on top of what we have already let them take.

If you are trying to introduce this canard of an argument as a replacement for B.S.waves fallacious statements that IDCC "needs the money that ISO will raise" you may want to think again -- unless you truly believe that ISO is a superior choice to a 3:2 split as a method of increasing the sharecount.


Now, as for people "all wanting a gold plated crapper" I wouldn't know about that. It sounds uncomfortable.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News