InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 461
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2011

Re: razorback74 post# 18768

Wednesday, 03/05/2014 12:46:59 PM

Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:46:59 PM

Post# of 43288
From the November 12, 2013 10-Q…

On April 6, 2009, we filed a provisional patent on an emissive two-dimensional screen that is controlled and driven by a standard digital light projector or other optical input source. This provisional patent is called "Flexible/Inflexible Front/Back Projection screen or display" and owned solely by 3DIcon Corporation. On March 12, 2013, we filed a provisional patent application for glasses-free rear projection 3D display with a new architecture that we believe will significantly lower the cost of this type of display. This provisional patent application is called “Holoform Projection Display” and is solely owned by 3DIcon. On July 26th, 2013, we filed a provisional patent application called “Ultra High Resolution Three-Dimensional Display” for a Z-axis scanning system that significantly enhances the performance of the CSpace technology and that is solely owned by 3DIcon.

I would say Victor needs to get these provisional’s morphed into utility’s pretty quick. If you’ll review page 13, the patents owned by OU are simply called “our CSpace technology.” What’s apparent to me, and crucial, is the utility filing for our high resolution patent. Why? Because if it significantly enhances the performance of CSpace technology… consequently, CSpace technology is useless without it!

So that brings the question: How much is our “Ultra High Resolution Three-Dimensional Display” patent really worth?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CRTG News