InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,472.73
(
-0.01%
)
US TECH 100
19,218.40
(
-0.21%
)
Dow Jones
39,183.74
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
85.36
(
0.41%
)
Bitcoin
64,234.90
(
-0.90%
)
Post# of 26631
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

badge792

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 914
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/04/2010

badge792

Re: badge792 post# 23895

Wednesday, 02/26/2014 8:28:39 PM

Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:28:39 PM

Post# of 26631
Wow, how the tides have changed for the worse. There is nothing good about this article....nothing at all.

I have a feeling someone is going to say that Steve has his facts wrong, and instead of a "strained relationship" between PTQ and FQ as stated in the article, everything is great.

Apparently the mediation has to do FQ not paying what they owe from the prior agreement. If we are successful and they are forced to pay what they owe, then we are no better off when the original deal was worked out.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up