Labor Smart Inc (LTNC)

[jmurfk]

No loss is good. Just trying to keep the facts straight. We don't want false info out there, do we?

So let me get this straight the fact that I had them only losing 100 grand in 2012 and not the 450 grand they did lose is somehow better news

Just the claim of them having a net loss of 100K isn't the point. It was the use of the 100K loss claim in conjunction with a claim of losses increasing 20 times, as opposed to using the factual number of 450K, which would only reflect a loss increase of 4 times. I thought it needed to be corrected.

On the negative side, 20 times sure sounds much worse than 4 times, and I can see why it was used.