InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/03/2003

Re: blueskywaves post# 22677

Monday, 05/05/2003 10:48:37 AM

Monday, May 05, 2003 10:48:37 AM

Post# of 432922
blueskywaves, To get back to your last post to me, I find it both interesting and a little amusing that you consider accusing someone of working for IDCC, an attack. Of course I didn't even accuse you, but rather QUESTIONED, if you had ANY connection; a question you still did not catagorically deny.

You characterised my post as a "a rambling emotional argument with no useful data". I disagree. I wasn't rambling but rather was posing questions that you avoided answering. You accused me of wanting to argue about IDCC's excessive compensation. I don't want to ARGUE about anything. I had some questions that illustrated my concerns but you don't seem to want to engage in a civil DISCUSSION in order to convince me my concerns have no merit.

You brought up QCOM, ARMHY and RMBS as justification that IDCC's management is not over compensated with options. I don't consider that to be a valid argument since I feel they ALL recieve more options than are justified. My reasons why are again inherent in the questions I posed to you in my earlier post. QCOM has an additional reason for not being a valid comparison in that Irwin Jacobs did found the company unlike the managers of IDCC. There can be no question as to the degree that company has benefitted from his leadership since the company wouldn't even exist without him.

Incidently, yeah, you did bring up those other companies and how much per share they generate. If I'm not wrong, those companies have split their stock several times. If IDCC were to split, which I would think they would if the price rises, wouldn't that change your figures? Does that alter your argument?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News