Ontheedge,
"The truly unique aspect of CDEX's work is the discovery (not found by any other research group until CDEX revealed it) that certain co-existing materials that are detectable by x-ray fluorescence are present in all explosives manufactured by all countries in existing landmines.
Then you say this:
"I am expressing my thoughts of what I have read. If and when you have the time to read any and all patents you can regarding " detectable by x-ray fluorescence ", and take 33 pages of specific notes, you may or may not come to the same conclusion I have.
You are trying to twist words into my mouth again."
I'm twisting your words? No sir, you made a statement of fact, plain and simple. I THINK ANY REASONABLE READER WOULD NOT INTERPRET YOUR AUTHORITATIVE STATEMENT AS AN "EXPRESSION OF THOUGHTS".
You claimed that CDEx discovered it and it is the truly unique aspect of CDEX's work.
You claimed that CDEx revealed it, not you.
NOW you claim that it's only YOUR THOUGHTS and you came to your conclusion based on what you did not find in any other patent. That's some interesting deductive reasoning! Can you explain how that works?
Bottome line: You made claims that the discovery was the truly unique aspect of CDEx's work and that CDEx revealed it (the discovery).
THERE IS NO TWISTING NOR MISINTERPRETATION.
You've changed your story once again!!
But I understand, it would practically take a genius to create a story that encompasses all the aggravating circumstances and loose ends that makes up this saga.
Although I think TheCiscoKidd does a pretty good job, don't you?
