"Where is there any evidence that Solms has taken the steps normally associated with a "turn around specialist" (Cutting unprofitable business units, trimming > 200K a year family perk jobs, etc...)"
Where is there not evidence? Ie. it remains unknown. If it's unknown can we "assume" nothing has happened?
"There is no evidence, there have been no announcements, the issue was avoided on the last CC, *that IS* business as usual."
Right, there is no evidence. No evidence ie. announcements means one can assume it's "business as usual"? There would be announcements relating to specific cost trimming measures and other improvements to the organization?
"As for the speculation, when the losses continue and the money drain of Scrambls, e-Sign, Michael, Peter, continues, there are only two choices:"
Speculation indeed, in fact do we even have numbers for the supposed "Scrambls/e-Sign/Michael/Peter drain"?
I would like to learn that cost cutting and other measures such as improving the sales culture and other aspects have put Q4 and Q1 on a sustainable path to CFBE, but at the same time I recognize we may have to wait for the next earnings call to find out vs. having expectations that specifics relating to cost cutting and the such will be announced separately.