I was asking the question in earnest, not insinuating that wsgi isn't worth much more. In fact, quite the opposite.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. There has to be something there if there is interest in the army to test even after months of actually owning 2 units. As Indy said, why did they actually hire a trainer for the bib if there is no interest to pursue further. I do not doubt that there is good tech here. Just wishing that the focus could have been in gtc a little more since who knows how long one needs to wait for army red tape sales cycle.
If we had consistent revenues to "live off" from gtc or commercial penetration of bib, we would not need to care how long the army will take to place orders. We need to get to that comfortable breakeven point of revenues and expenses, and a little profit per month would not hurt either!!
I think Glenn's plan of hunting big game is aggressive and can yield big or can put shareholders in more dilutive position that they could care for. I have always believed in being more conservative. Make sure one has basal sustainance before one aims for the big game.
