Atlanta1...you dont give up...admirable...but misguided trying to get people to move out of 2 proven winners into the "broken winged" third.
Which 2 of the 3 have more probability of being a winner and more of a sure thing in the next 30 days?
1. A stock that has based for 10 weeks with "brake-out" fundamentals and technicals, about to reach blue sky? and/or
2. A stock that has had steady appreciation with huge fundamental catalysts and "brake-out" technicals on the verge of uplisting, hitting blue sky? or
3. A stock with broken technicals, unfulfilled fundamentals, cant see the light of day and "betting" on an unverifiable "catalyst" (naked short)...100% forced into a RS at the end of the month as last ditch effort to "discover" if and how big short might be, all out of desperation to uplist, to allegedly "attract" PE and Funds based upon "uplisting", after which we don't know whether aggressive shorting does not occur all over again???
Which two of the three more likely to double in the next 30 days?
And which software company has proven it can execute a plan ...so far? IMHO...much "at risk" giving up winners for one that still has a lot to prove to customers and investors.