InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1755
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/13/2013

Re: nutsyprofessor post# 24821

Saturday, 01/25/2014 10:40:12 AM

Saturday, January 25, 2014 10:40:12 AM

Post# of 423548
Nuts - I don't normally post here. Yea, your correct about TGs above 500. So, what if my levels are 499, 498, 497 . . . Then all is hunky dory?? The point I'm getting at, is this whole situation is completely F'd up. The American Heart Assoc, among other organizations all recommend TG levels below 200 (actually 150) due to risk of heard disease. Twice, mine were over 200 and my Dr about krapped a brick.

So, who's correct here, the FDA or most every other organization? In fairness to the people, if the FDA is correct, then the guidelines need to be revised as the confusion is unacceptable.

Personally, I side with the AHA and others as logic is totally on their side (if their is any truth at all about the dangers of fats in your blood).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News