My take is that G sees itself as so large and powerful it refuses to acknowledge, accept and yield to judicial authority when it disagrees with court decisions critical to its single-minded agenda.
In other circles this is called "gangsterism" or "organized crime." How this can possibly go on, or be permitted to persist, in the hallowed halls of US justice is beyond me.
If the courts and judiciary are the determining elements here, WHERE (and WHAT) is the ENFORCING element? What agency or authority can immediately compel the forcible transfer of funds from an adjudged loser who WILL NOT ACCEPT LOSS to the victor in a civil confrontation like this, regardless of the protestations of the loser?
I picture a low-level felon in shackles and cuffs being pronounced guilty by a jury and then dragged off to the hoosegow kicking and screaming in defiant contempt all the way. Then I see G being adjudged equally guilty smirking at the bench and slipping out the front door to board a private jet for weekend cocktails in Bali.
Something is wrong with this picture. I just can't put it into words properly. I'm totally disgusted with GOOGLE as it has taken on the mien of a 3-ring circus. Someone, somewhere, PLEASE assemble a program I can buy that will purge everything Google off my machine, and a web site I can visit to learn about how many other companies Google owns or has acquired over the years so I can avoid them too. Their corporate REPROBATION and MENDACITY knows no bounds. They may be rich, but I don't have to give them so much as a nickel. Bye-bye, YouTube, it's been nice knowing you. This lawsuit has been a "learning experience" for my whole family in more ways than one.
