InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[my3sons87]

And the final part of the CAFC remand decision, in the ITC 337-613 case, that I will post. But I will say the ITC needs to get in gear and initiate the remand or put out an order consistent with the CAFC, as summarized below.

Nokia has not challenged the administrative law judge’s findings as to that nexus. Nor has Nokia ques-tioned whether the scope of InterDigital’s licensing activi-ties was sufficient to constitute a domestic licensing industry, a point on which the administrative judge made extensive affirmative findings. Accordingly, we reject Nokia’s “domestic industry” argument.
V
Because the Commission erred in construing the claim terms “code” and “increased power level” and in finding, based on those claim constructions, that Nokia’s products do not infringe InterDigital’s patents, we reverse the administrative law judge’s determination of non-infringement and remand for further proceedings.
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS v. ITC
24
REVERSED AND REMANDED