InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[warbil]

GBR, it's simple, it's called "Obama Law". It doesn't have to be factual or correct anymore. Just cite some previous case law and push it on out so someone else can deal with it.

The CAFC reversed some obvious inconsistencies in claims interpretations in the 613 case and remanded it back to the ITC for correction. To date that remand is nowhere to be found. Then, the CAFC directed a little harsher criticism at the ITC in it's decision on the LG termination from the 800 case based on LG's claim for arbitration. I believe the phrase "boob heads" was stricken from the official record before releasing that remand order back to the ITC.

Should the CAFC find equally disturbing inconsistencies in the claims interpretations of the ITC in its review of the 800 case, IDCC should petition the CAFC to render its own opinion as to validity of patents and infringement thereof on the grounds the ITC is incapable of rendering a meaningful opinion on any patent subject matter due to its lack of competency in the field.