InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 2723
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/05/2004

Re: balbrec2 post# 37489

Friday, 01/10/2014 4:42:12 AM

Friday, January 10, 2014 4:42:12 AM

Post# of 47148
Found this to be interesting as well. The 50% invested providing 85% of the fully invested return made me think of this graphic on the Vanguard investors website.

This is the link/page to which I think you are referring

https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insights/investingtruths/investing-truth-about-risk

A point of note is that those are arithmetic averages (I believe). That doesn't however impact the overall ratio though i.e. for 100% stock we might approximate the standard deviation as being the highest extreme for 100% stock i.e. 54.2% highest annual gain, less the average gain of 10% = 34.2% as being a three sigma (standard deviation) event, such that 1 standard deviation approximates to a third of that = 11.4%

Given the arithmetic average (10%) and standard deviation (11.4) we can approximate the geometric gain using Pythagorean CAGR approximation



which works out in that particular case to 9.4% annualised.

Do the same for 50-50 (max 32.3%, average 8.3%, approx std. dev of 8 - and a 8.3% arithmetic average with 8 std. dev = 8 annualised (geometric) approximation.

8% annualised from 50-50 compared to 9.4% annualised from 100% stock is also 85%.

Clive.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.