InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 351
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2011

Re: Optimistic Trader post# 17521

Friday, 01/03/2014 2:29:21 PM

Friday, January 03, 2014 2:29:21 PM

Post# of 235076
Here's another added thought. If Whitesky settles out, they would then be admitting to also using Sfor's patented technology. With that being said, in order for Whitesky to continue to provide keystroke encryption to Comcast, or any other company that may have contracted Whitesky to do so, they would have to pay royalties. I know this isn't a patent infringement case, but in a sense it is the same. If Whitesky admits to selling trade secrets and asking Zemena to make an exact duplicate of Sfor technology then they are also agreeing that they are using Sfor's patented technology. Believe you and me Sfor imo would be making them pay to continue to use it. And does anyone think Whitesky would waste their time and money fighting an infringement case after admitting that? No. Depending on the contracts with the companies they provide the technology to, they could be forced to keep providing it and paying royalties to Sfor. While this may give them a settlement it could also help lock in some revenue for the future. That is if these companies deem the product necessary. Of course this is just a thought i had. Anybody else's opinion on this matter would be greatly appreciated.