InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 211
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2011

Re: Tibby post# 18815

Monday, 12/30/2013 11:26:50 PM

Monday, December 30, 2013 11:26:50 PM

Post# of 30002
You're right. Juneau doesn't matter.

I only bring it up to demonstrate how utterly careless Mr. Johnson is with shareholder money. Left on his own to negotiate on properties, his default position seems to be: "Okay, let me start sending over wheelbarrows full of money, and you tell me how it goes. Oh... and if it doesn't work out <wink, wink> I'll assume that you have assets somewhere else to pay the shareholders back with, right? Uh... no... no written agreement is necessary... not unless the regulators get involved. Yes... go ahead and order whatever you want... I'm expensing this meal."

Where you're wrong is on Chile. Barrick has already folded up their tents and walked away from this thing. Last I heard, Lopehandia's lawyer is applying to talk to the court about adding additional environmental protections to a project that is not being worked on. Which means...?

Which means that MSX has no plan and no play but to throw stones at the other guy. When the other guy walks away to a safe range, what's the game then?

Meanwhile, JL has publicly maintained that MSX could pick up shovels and begin mining on his claims immediately.

Give your head a shake.

Prove our claims, and we win. Sounds a lot more productive than chasing paper through courtrooms in Chile.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.