InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 26189
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/30/2004

Re: 10 bagger post# 1475

Thursday, 02/02/2006 12:31:51 AM

Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:31:51 AM

Post# of 14027
10bagger, you question or put a negative spin to all or practically all of GFCI /CTBG's PRs, yet you unquestioningly buy into the theory that CTBG paid for the recent e-mail /fax blitz. Can you ackonoledge that the blitz could have been a pump and dump scheme, piggy backing on the Legitimate PRs? CTBG isn 't listed as the paying party in any of the 3 e-mails or the one fax that I saw.

You are, or have been, an investing professional. Please be frank here Hank. Do you belive a company would pay 500,000 shares for an e-mail with a line at the end that, to the effect, read "If CTBG cannot secure financing, they could cease to be a going concern" ?

IMO the 3 e-mail were the pump.The fax was the last piece of the blitz. It had the going concern comment and was the dump. E-mails are more traceable than a fax. It was designed to creat doubt and start the selling. It worked.