InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 104
Posts 18365
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: WisePolicalEconomist post# 9035

Monday, 12/09/2013 10:09:47 PM

Monday, December 09, 2013 10:09:47 PM

Post# of 197539
Wise, everybody wants to keep going back to the 2009(?) 100 modulators and to the LMT, etc etc

my take remains the same, the materials apparently were not reproducible at that time so TT I would guess had a good batch, but presumably could not replicate later, I'd guess same thing was problematical with LMT, remember the development efforts back then were funded on a shoestring budget with not the best lab/equip etc (also, wasn't LMT doing the optical limiter thing, and lwlg materials were too fast?)

I think all the pieces are in place now, and as for the LSS being the top priority before and then now being shifted behind internal device developments (and again, Tom did say BOTH had much of the same requirements so I still think the LSS is not really on hold), remember at that time we were not yet focused in internal device development, I don't think we had the proper labs/equip etc once again, and now that has changed, and now we do have working proto device(s)

in any case, I think the 12-18 month design-in window is the red zone, and imo there will only be 1 more visit to the patch before we find out what's really what

jmho
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News