InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 104
Posts 18365
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: inversor86 post# 8947

Friday, 12/06/2013 12:46:57 PM

Friday, December 06, 2013 12:46:57 PM

Post# of 197539
inversor, my point remains that nothing has changed with the LSS one iota from the last update, we met certain criteria, and we needed to meet other (undefined) criteria, that is EXACTLY where we stand today based on what Tom said, only now he is saying we'll do that, but we are going to prioritize our internal developments ahead of the LSS, but then in the next breath he said that much of the internal needs are the same as the LSS requirements


again, the reply I got from Steve overnight,

We are putting the call up shortly. I think that you may have misinterpreted what we said. If you recall, the LSS liked our material but had wanted us to achieve certain other parameters which requires synthetic work. We are actually working on that, however we are also working on perfecting our materials for use in our own device structures. Tom made the decision to focus on this effort first before we go back to the LSS with our materials. This way--as he said on the call, we will be dealing from a position of power. Shareholders should be happy about this in my opinion.

Hope this helps.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News