InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 464
Posts 7524
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2010

Re: wallas2g1 post# 81839

Tuesday, 11/26/2013 11:05:32 PM

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:05:32 PM

Post# of 347761

You know who else could be liable? You and the individual who gave you and the other shareholders material non public information for the purpose of trading.

Actually, not really. First of all, I have not given anyone non public, material information to anyone for the purpose of trading, so you do not need to concern yourself about me. If anything, it appears both Vanis and Cousens gave non-public material information to shareholders regarding financing, although not necessarily for the purpose of trading.

Shareholders sharing information obtained from company insiders is not against the law. As a matter of fact, shareholders have the right to assembly to discuss their investments with others. The illegal part is to trade on insider information or to fabricate or embellish information obtained from insiders for the purpose of manipulating stock price for their own gain. This applies to all shareholders and insiders. What happened with MINE goes beyond the usual "churning of the rumor mill" we see in pennyland. These were blatant lies aimed to deceive shareholders.

Sorry to disappoint you but again you are pointing the finger at the wrong person.

In God We Trust. All Others Must Pay Cash.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.