DD Support Board and Research Team

[samsamsamiam]

NTEK/Antony Santos/Ted D Campbell II

This is part of the reason I am researching this area - in particular the question raised by Santos to Ted Campbell on his blog:
A.M. Santos LawJuly 11, 2013 at 12:48 PM

Ted, Have you seen any instance of regulatory action against attorneys or issuers for misreporting shell status and subsequently relying 144 to issue and ultimately sell restricted stock as though free-trading? Thanks for commenting.


======

Is NTEK considered to be a shell company or not?

They filed an 8k claiming they were not than filed that Form 15.


NTEK - Change in Shell status:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1425905/000114420412015631/v306331_8k.htm


=====

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NTEK&id=109584

page 13


Third Party Providers

General Counsel : A.M. Santos Law, CHTD

Antony M. Santos, Esq.

Nevada Bar No: 11265

Connecticut Bar No: 33256

5440 West Sahara Avenue Third Floor

Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

Tel: [phone]

Email: [e-mail]



=======



The reason I ask is this comment made on Antony Santos law Blog - asking Ted Campbell a question. (they have been friends since the NEVWEST days)



http://amsantoslaw.blogspot.com/2013/07/sec-obtains-final-judgment-against.html

Ted CampbellJuly 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM

Someday attorneys will realize that the SEC is watching their actions with regards to securities opinions very closely AND are going after them for fraud. More importantly is legal opinions that allowing a Rule 405 shell company to get unregistered securities released into the market. They take the company's word that they are not a Rule 405 shell because of the check mark on the 10Qs and the fact they get paid big money for writing them. The are just as guilty as the seller of the unregistered securities into the market, maybe even more so.

Reply
Replies

A.M. Santos LawJuly 11, 2013 at 12:48 PM

Ted, Have you seen any instance of regulatory action against attorneys or issuers for misreporting shell status and subsequently relying 144 to issue and ultimately sell restricted stock as though free-trading? Thanks for commenting.

ajh October 25, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Here's one:
SEC v. Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, et al.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2011/comp22189.pdf





=======

Ted Campbell is the director of NTEK

He was founder of NevWest.
Ted D. Campbell II is President and CEO of GrowPublic, Inc. He has worked in the areas of federal and state registered/exempt corporate securities offerings, application of the federal securities rules and regulations to such offerings, and corporate listing on the National Quotation Bureau's Electronic Pink Sheets and NASD's OTCBB. Mr. Campbell is a former founder and principal of NevWest Securities Corporation, which was a NASD licensed, Level Three Introducing Broker Dealer and Market Maker. He was also President and CEO of Campbell Mello Associates, Inc. from 1996-1999 which was one of the first consultants on the Internet offering Direct Public Offerings, Hedge Fund development, Form 211 filings, and other corporate consulting services. Mr. Campbell is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma in 1993 with a Juris Doctorate and a Masters in Business Administration and a graduate of Texas A&M University in 1989 with a B.B.A. in Corporate Finance (Graduated with Distinguished Student Status).
-------

Antony Santos is the CMKX guy that has been litigated in the past.



http://www.rgm.com/articles/nasd8.html

NASD Charges NevWest Securities Corporation and Principals
with Violating Anti-Money Laundering Rules

Firm Failed to File Suspicious Activity Reports Despite Suspicious Sales Of Hundreds of Billions of Shares of Sub-Penny Stock by Customer

Washington, D.C., September 26, 2006 … NASD announced today that it has charged NevWest Securities Corporation of Las Vegas and two of its top officers - President Sergey Rumyantsev and Vice President Antony M. Santos - with violating NASD's Anti-Money Laundering Rule.


=====

of interest Sergey's name appears on another SEC filling as author of a document on SVAD - also that involves Ted Campbell. these guys are still working together.