Friday, November 15, 2013 12:49:50 PM
Let's just run with that. Still, why would we use the profit numbers per gallon in Q3 knowing that...
(1) It included inventory that cost much more than the current costs of inventory.
(2) The costs per gallon have come down significantly compared to the quarter just prior.
(3) JBII's overheard is not the same as the overhead of a processor buyer. For example, if Crayola were to buy a processor, would they need to add an entire accounting department, a new chief of technology, a new CFO, and all of the other staff JBII has along with 10K and 10Q audit fees, a whole new property and headquarters, etc. etc.? Of course not.
(4) Future fuel prices are unknown.
A buyer would have significantly less feedstock costs than JBII had in Q3, and a buyer wouldn't have JBII's overheard. It would not cost Crayola, for example, $5.2 million in overheard to have a processor on site comingled with its current operations.
Raw
Research & analysis on some of my favorite stocks is located on the sticky note on the SwingTrade board.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1781
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM