How come
the SEC has done nothing to companies like ABAT for example for failing to file periodic and timely financials. I think one of CHBT's arguments for getting their shares re registered was the inconsistent actions of the SEC, and no clear definition of timely. Just saying. Not trying to wish ABAT ill, but just trying to make sense of the selective actions of the SEC. And, also just wondering why the SEC accepted all of CHBT filings to bring them current, then revoked registration???? Note: in the SEC documentation, 3rd party information is factored into the SEC decisions, but the SEC refused to disclose the identity, and probably ways the info was obtained when CHBT by right requested disclosure. Strange. Just trying to wrap my head around the whole multi year multi company multi rule US China US listed company saga.
