Just for arguements sake, let's say a company like Merck influences various political entities to make it's Gardasil vaccine mandatory for children down to 12 years old. (In some states, without parental permission). This has happened in a couple of states. Are they any different than JW? Maybe with the exception that Gardasil vaccines have noted serious side effects, and benifits are questionable at best. (So maybe they are worse, as well as the supporting politicions). Who is going after them? Seems to be a good old boys network as to what is acceptable or not. Promote a product that may very well lower health care costs, or promote a product that is questionable at best, and is funded by the tax payer for a ridiculous price. Arguements about character, bribery, etc., are ridiculous. This is America, where anything goes for a buck. It's just that some causes are better justified than others. (HA HA). When it boils down to facts, like A-Bloc showing benifits for auto-immune diseases, it should be a no brainer to continue to support the product and further studies. But I guess that would go against Pharma and Gov's plan to kill us off, or put us in debt to our eyeballs with traditional treatments. Lot's of effective treatments out their that Pharma and Gov try to squash all the time. Just venting, and all said is just my humble opinion.
