InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 2219
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2013

Re: Jollymon1958 post# 39823

Tuesday, 11/12/2013 9:16:07 AM

Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:16:07 AM

Post# of 232825
Tony Chung buying shares at a lower price seems positive to me. He might be early career by some peoples standards but he seems really sharp.

Steipp to me seems strategic for sure and their plan ( which he doesn't really speak to broadly in CCs ( unless asked)), could be pretty elaborate and extensive.

The Engel development sounds potentially positive and significant (tbd) depending on what terms are negotiated.

It all sounds good except for how LQMT will potentially generate growing revenues and earnings from it which is yet to prove out.

But, Chung did mention an anticipation of growing margins in the near term and it was mentioned that the canard activity was seen as a stepping stone.

After some thought and reading some other posts on this board about unattractive margin splits in agreements with VPC, I think that it could be positive for investors if LQMT were able to second source potential customers directly ( without VPC) if that truly is a reason that their revenue is or could be lower than expected in the future.

So the outcome of their arbitration could have a positive or negative impact on expectations, it seems to me, that could potentially weigh on what investors might expect.

I tend to think that LQMT can come out of this ahead if they can negotiate favorable terms for the company going forward, but until that happens .........
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News